Creeping Islamisation.

ELEMENTS of Islamic law - the sharia - should be legally recognised in Australia so that Muslims can live according their faith, a prominent Muslim leader says.

Addressing an open day at Lakemba Mosque on Saturday, the president of the Australian Islamic Mission, Zachariah Matthews, said parts of sharia could be recognised as a secondary legal system so that Muslims were not forced to act contrary to their beliefs. ”Sharia law could function as a parallel system in the same way that some traditional Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander law was recognised in the Northern Territory,” Dr Matthews told the Herald after the session.

Zachariah Matthews has just admitted that Islam is incompatible with Australian law and culture. So why do we continue to allow 28,000 Muslims to migrate here every year? How can we be so cruel? We are forcing these poor people to act contrary to their beliefs. The answer is simple. Stop all immigration from Islamic countries and for Muslims who are finding it sooo difficult to live by Australian law they have 2 choices. Obey it or LEAVE!!!

The comments shocked some attending the open day. They felt Dr Matthews was advocating the introduction of the penal system under which women have been stoned to death for adultery, and corporal punishment is meted out for some offences.

”It came as quite a shock to some non-Muslims in the crowd when sharia law and the idea of a parallel legal system was mentioned,” one audience member, Jasmine Donnelly, said.

”One group of people just left straight after that.”

But Dr Matthews said he was referring only to certain elements of family law and inheritance law and was not advocating the sharia penal system.

”I wasn’t talking about sharia law in its entirety - we are not calling for the introduction of the penal system which calls for cutting off hands,” he said.

Of course he’s not talking about Sharia law in it’s entirety. Yet.

UPDATE:

Let’s have a look at how countries practicing Sharia law rate on the 2009 World gender gap index.

The 2009 report by the World Economic Forum has listed predominantly Islamic nations in the bottom of their annual Global Gender Gap (GGG) Index. This included such major nations as Pakistan (ranked 132 out of 134), Saudi Arabia (ranked 130 out of 134), Iran (ranked 128 out of 134), Egypt (ranked 126 out of 134), and Turkey (ranked 129 out 134). Yemen, which is 99 percent Islamic, was the bottom ranked nation as 134 on the Global Gender Gap Index. The only nation not predominantly Islamic in the bottom of the Global Gender Gap index was Benin.

In addition, the 2009 World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Index report does not include rankings on a number of significant and predominantly Islamic nations where women are oppressed. Somalia (population of nearly 10 million) was not included in the index. Endless numbers of reports of the stonings and Islamic supremacist abuses of women have been reported in Somalia in the past year, including the stoning to death of a 13 year old girl based on “Sharia law” in October 2008. Sudan (population of nearly 41 million) was also not included in the World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Index. Among other nations, Afghanistan (29 million) and Iraq (29 million) are also not included in this Global Gender Gap Index. With the index not reporting on these 109 million, the desperate fate of an estimated 50 plus million women are not included in this Global Gender Gap index report.

Read the rest here.

Our politicians had better say NO to this outrageous demand and they had better say it loudly and clearly!

UPDATE:

Excellent article here.

Here is an interesting speech I read on the Refugee Resettlement Watch blog

WHY LIBERALS ARE MORE DANGEROUS THAN TERRORISTS

By Jack Wheeler

March 5, 2010

[This is a speech I am delivering today to the members of the Council for National Policy, leaders of conservative organizations across America, meeting in Naples, Florida.]

There’s no time to waste here, so I’m going to skip the obligatory warm-up joke and get to the root of the problem.

First, Moslems are not really the problem, neither Moslem terrorists nor Moslem imperialists insisting on their medieval Sharia laws.

Christendom has been fighting Islam for almost fifteen centuries. The Spaniards fought 800 years to get rid of the Moslem invaders of their Christian lands. 800 years! That’s how long the Reconquista took. How long have we in America been at it – two decades?

Islam is a self-identified religion of the sword. It cannot be anything else but. “Islam” is an Arabic word. It means submission. Moslems claim this means submit to Allah. What it really means is submit to them or die. Just the same as it was for the Communists of the Soviet Union.

Thus there can be no peace between Jihadi or Sharia Moslems and us, anymore than there could be with Soviet Communists. “Peace” for us means the absence of violence. “Peace” for Jihadis and Communists means the absence of disobedience. So there can be no peace, there can only be victory or submission.

We achieved victory over the Communists of the Soviet Union. How may we achieve victory over the Moslems of Jihad and Sharia? Let’s go to Africa to find out.

Anyone here been to the Serengeti? Then you know the tribe that lives on the plains of the Serengeti is the Masai. How do the Masai make a living? They are cattle herders. Cattle herders in lion country. Lots of lions live in the Serengeti, and they love to eat cows. Cows are easy to kill and taste real good. What have the Masai got to protect their cattle – and themselves – from the lions? Spears. No guns, just spears.

What do the Masai wear for clothing? Bright red robes. They want to make sure the lions see them, know where they are. For when a lion sees a Masai, it is the lion that runs away, not the Masai. Lions are scared of the Masai, who are very, very good at hunting lions down and killing them. With spears.

Lions are predators. There can be no peace between predators and prey. Islam is a predatory religion. Jihadi Moslems are predators. So the only solution is to have them be so afraid of us that they leave us alone, just like lions leave the Masai alone on the Serengeti Plains of Africa. They either run away or get a spear in their gut.

So the question becomes: Why don’t we treat Moslem predators like Masai treat lions?

It’s because the Masai, even though they live in primitive conditions, have something we once had and have now lost: cultural confidence. They have a fierce pride and confidence in their culture that we no longer have.

Our Founding Fathers sure had it. Thomas Jefferson sure had it, when he condemned King George for inflicting upon Americans – quote from the Declaration of Independence – “the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare is undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes, and conditions.”

The men and women who fought those savages to create an American civilization from sea to shining sea sure had it. We’ve lost it. How? Let’s go to the Amazon to find out.

There is a tribe in the Amazon called the Yanomamo. When a Yanomamo woman gives birth to a baby, she cries out is a loud lament, “Oh my baby is so ugly! Why have the spirits cursed me with such an ugly baby?” She does this so the other villagers won’t envy her happiness at her beautiful child.

This is the famous fear of envious Black Magic, the fear of the Evil Eye that permeates so many cultures, from primitive tribes in the Amazon to Harvard-educated liberals in America. For just like the Yanomamo tribeswoman who says her baby is ugly to deflect envy, so the American liberal says his country is ugly.

Perhaps the most instructive of all Ten Commandments is the last: Thou shalt not covet – don’t be envious. Yet it needs a corollary: Thou shalt not fear those who covet – don’t be afraid of the envious. For it is this fear that gives the envious their power over us.

For example, the crux understanding of Moslem terrorism or Jihadism is that it is a pathology of envy.

All three of the great barbarisms of modern times have been pathologies of envy. Naziism, preaching race-envy toward “rich exploitative Jews”; Communism preaching class-envy toward “rich exploitative bourgeois”; Jihadism preaching culture-envy toward “rich exploitative America/Israel/the West.” In all three cases, the belief in exploitation is a primitive belief in voodoo Black Magic.

What gives envy its enormous destructive capacity is the fear of it, fear of the Evil Eye. It is envy that makes a Nazi, a Communist, or a Moslem Terrorist. It is the fear of being envied that makes a Liberal.

Liberalism is thus not a political ideology or set of beliefs. It is an envy-deflection device, a psychological strategy to avoid being envied. Liberalism is the politicalization of envy-appeasement.

And thus liberals are driven to ever more masochistic efforts of self-humiliation in attempts at envy appeasement.

All the passions of the Left are frenzies of masochism. What could be more idiotic and masochistic than to oppose missile defense? Liberals oppose missile defense because… they do not want their country defended.

Liberals promulgate their “global warming” hoax because… they do not want their civilization to prosper.

Liberals are pro-abortion because… they do not want their species to exist.

Liberals wallow in their ethical goo of moral relativism and multiculturalism because… they do not want their culture to survive. “Political correctness” is nothing but a form of envy-appeasement – which is why, just as one example, we have politically correct airport security rather than profiling Moslems.
As the Amazon tribeswoman who says her baby is ugly, so the liberal says his country, his culture, his civilization and even his entire species is ugly.

This is why liberals always root for those who revile America. Liberals are incapacitated from being able to defend America because of their primitive fear of the Evil Eye of America’s enemies. Liberals are incapable of pride, deep pride, in being American. Instead they feel embarrassment.

So – how do we regain cultural confidence for America? It’s a simple recipe of two words:

Reject envy.

This is a note of 100 Yuans – the currency of Communist China. While we have George Washington and Abraham Lincoln on our money, the Chicoms have Mao Tse-Tung, whom the Guinness Book of World Records lists as the greatest mass murderer in human history. America is vastly more moral than Communist China. Yet we kowtow to the Red Chinese.

Christianity is vastly more moral than Islam. Ours is a religion of love and forgiveness. Islam is a religion of conquest and slavery. Repeatedly in the Koran, Allah advocates slavery, providing a plethora of detailed rules and permissions regarding slave ownership. Either slavery is moral or Allah is immoral. Moslems must choose.

But we cannot ask them to choose, we cannot stand up to Moslem terrorists or Communist Chinese or any enemy of America, foreign or domestic, if we do not reject their envy.

There could not be a clearer example of the disastrous consequences of America’s failing to reject envy than the election of Barack Hussein Obama – a man with utterly no experience or qualifications, a man no one in the country would have paid the slightest attention to if he were white.

The only reason this man was elected was because he was black, because of his race – it was the most racist election in American history, a deeply masochistic exercise in envy-appeasement.

At least now we can all understand the horrific results of envy-appeasement. And while this is in no way an endorsement of Mitt Romney’s presidential aspirations – I’m all up all in for Sarah Palin – he has provided the antidote with the title of his book, No Apology.

That is the message conservatives must stand for at every opportunity: No apology for America, no apology for our success, our prosperity, our power, our religion, our culture, our civilization.

That and the American message of Live and Let Live. You leave us alone and we’ll leave you alone. But if you don’t, if you attempt to terrorize, threaten, or intimidate us, you’ll end up like a lion at the tip of a Masai spear.

This statement in particular reminds me of a conversation I had with a liberal just a few days ago.

they do not want their civilization to prosper.

The liberal was telling me that she believes there is going to be some kind of catastrophe in 2012 that will cause death and destruction world wide and will end capitalism AND she is looking forward to it.
She wants to go back to the days before we became reliant on mod cons.
When I pointed out that she may have trouble stalking and killing animals on the Mornington Peninsula in quantities large enough to feed herself and her family, or grow enough crops on her small suburban block to sustain them, she just laughed.
After I left she probably loaded the coffee mugs in the dishwasher, put the milk away in the fridge, and then perhaps watched some television or checked her emails before driving over to the school to pick up her children.
This, by the way, is the same person I wrote about here.

With all the talk about bullying in the news lately, it’s surprising someone hasn’t suggested this tactic.

Mosab Hassan Yousef is the son of a jailed Hamas terrorist leader and MP, Sheikh Hassan Yousef, the most popular figure in that extremist Islamic organization. Mosab, as a young man, assisted his father for years in his political activities. He converted to Christianity and operated undercover in the service of Israel’s intelligence agency for a decade. Yousef reveals this information in an upcoming book, Son of Hamas: A Gripping Account of Terror, Betrayal, Political Intrigue, and Unthinkable Choices.

I saw this on the blog “Crusader Rabbit” this morning.
Check it out if you feel like a bit of a chuckle.

Angry Anderson speaks the truth:

ROCK’N'ROLL bad boy Gary Angry Anderson believes life experience has taught him “Aussies use their fists” when they fight and that “weapons were introduced by other cultures”.

The former Rose Tattoo frontman’s comments before a Parliamentary inquiry yesterday have experts describing his views as “pure fantasy” and ignoring “the realities of life”.

Anderson, 63, was adamant he’s not racist and said politically correct bureaucrats were getting in the way of progress when it comes to preventing youth violence.

“The racial thing, the cultural thing needs to be addressed because it’s not going to go away,” he told a Federal Parliamentary Committee into the impact of violence on youth.

“You never kick a bloke when he’s down . . . you don’t gang up on a bloke. These things are Australian and we shouldn’t shy away from being Australian.”

The father of four said he had taught his sons these principles, adding that “other cultures” - Lebanese, Indochinese and Pacific Islanders - had introduced weapons.

“We have to acknowledge that they have a different view about how they deal with each other,” he said.

“It’s not untoward for them to turn up to a fight with a hatchet.”

I presume my opinion must be “pure fantasy” too, because on 25th March 2008 I noted my own, very similar, observations on the way Australians used to fight compared to the cowardly acts we read about on a daily basis nowadays.

I hate to say this because it’ll make me sound ancient but back in the good old days if a group of people bashed one person or used a knife they were considered cowards and kicking people in the head while they were on the ground was absolutely not on. Times have changed. It seems that every day theres a story in the news of someone killed or in a coma because they’ve been bashed by a gang of cowardly thugs.

According to Anti discrimination Board president Stepan Kerkyasharian, Angry’s views were unrealistc.

“To suggest that if people of a particular kind of culture weren’t here a particular kind of violence wouldn’t occur is pure fantasy,” he said.

“To suggest a type of violence didn’t exist before is purely ignoring the realities of life.”

Someone’s living in fantasy land but I don’t think it’s me or Angry.

Rudd has demoted Peter Garrett.

KEVIN Rudd has stripped embattled Environment Minister Peter Garrett of climate change roles in the fallout from the $2.4 billion home insulation fiasco.

But I don’t understand. Why is Peter Garrett, who Rudd described as a “first class minister,” being punished when just a few days ago Rudd declared that he, Kevin Rudd, took full responsibility for the disaster.

KEVIN RUDD: Well, as far as responsibility for any government program, I as Prime Minister of the country, am responsible for the good news and the bad news, the implementation of programs effectively, the implementations of programs which have problems. As Prime Minister of the country I take full responsibility to that which goes well and that which doesn’t go so well.

Plan number one - stand by his minister and hope it would all blow over. Plan number one didn’t work.
Plan number two - take full responsibility.
More evidence of Kevin Rudd’s style of government. Say what you think they want to hear. He took full responsibility when he realised the opposition and the media were not going to let up. Of course taking full responsibility to Kevin Rudd means nothing more than uttering the empty words. For it was clear that he didn’t intend there to be any consequences for his stuff ups.
No consequences for him of course, but plenty for the Australian tax payer. Plenty of money that is, to fix their costly bungles.
When it became obvious to him that the take full responsibility ploy wasn’t going to take the heat off the government, he moved on to knee jerk -
Plan number 3 - demote Garrett.
We’ll have to wait and see if he gets away with this or whether he has to resort to Plan number four.

Remember back in the old days when the UK was full of “poms”? They were those white people who were renowned for their stiff upper lips and errr, … well, … umm they kind of had a reputation for whinging.

Now they are those poor disadvantaged workers watching as their inept government sends their hard earned tax dollars to crazy Islamic hellholes while their own services at home suffer.
They have watched as their government allowed Muslims to grow stronger and bolder at the expense of ordinary white Brits.
They have watched their country, once proud and strong, a World leader, slowly and gradually be destroyed by political correctness and multiculturalism.

How tragic and infuriating for the British.

I just hope we in Australia have the courage to stop this happening here. One thing I do know is a Labor government will never be the ones we can count on to protect our way of life. On the contrary they will accelerate and welcome our slide into cultural decimation.

The big question is whether a Liberal government will be too timid to stand up for the people of Australia. I can’t say I’m brimming with confidence.

If they do find the guts I think they will be astonished at the level of support they will receive. All they have to do is cite the findings of the Rudd governments white paper and point out Rudds complete failure to deal with the problem. The Rudd government will be shown up as being more incompetent and weaker than the public already perceives them to be and the Lib’s will look strong and decisive. It’s an absolute electoral winner.
But it will require a degree of intestinal fortitude. Do they have it?

WE didn’t need the Rudd Government to tell us this week that, ahem, our own Muslim community is now a growing terrorist threat.

What we needed was to hear what the Government planned to do about it.

And the answers in its new White Paper on counter-terrorism?

Virtually zilch. Not even a word on whether it would be wise to cut immigration from Muslim nations, now running at about 28,000 a year.

Nor was there anything about ending the mad multiculturalism that rewards most those who integrate least.

Thanks to David for sending me this video link.

A National security blueprint has found that the threat of homegrown terrorism has increased in the last 6 years.
Thanks to political correctness Australia is, and will forever more, be a target for terrorists. If we had gone down the intelligent road years ago and stopped all Muslim immigration we would not be in the position we find ourselves in now.
Not only that but our children and future generations would not be burdened with the cost, in lives lost, in security expenses and in loss of freedom that they will now inherit.
Thank you very much to all the goody two shoes, politically correct, left wing morons and anyone who listened to them. You are responsible for this! You should hang your heads in shame.

The Counter-Terrorism White Paper finds there has been an increase in the threat from people “born or raised” in Australia who have been influenced by a violent jihadist message.

So what’s Kev going to do about it?

The Rudd Government today will reveal new plans to stop terrorists coming into Australia with a $69 million scheme to force many visitors to give fingerprints and facial scans before getting a visa.

Rrrrrrighteo then.

Today’s report says the global threat is persistent and permanent, but shifts the focus to strategies to combat home-grown terrorist cells after high-profile police raids and arrests in Melbourne and Sydney.

The Government, which has been concerned for some time about the rise of domestic extremism, commissioned a study by Islamic scholar Prof Abdullah Saeed.

It is expected to unveil a plan to “build social cohesion” between communities, to encourage understanding and respect for cultural and religious differences and promote shared values. One option includes providing support for community leaders to challenge those who promote extremist propaganda and violence.

A term that when uttered by a Muslim or a Lefty is guaranteed to trigger alarm bells in my head.
SOCIAL COHESION.
For it can only mean one thing.
We, your average non Muslim Australian, will have to change.
We will have to be more tolerant.
We will have to shut up.
We will have to be more RESPECTFUL!!!
They will have to … well umm they will just have to continue doing whatever it is they’re doing.

And 10 years from now, and after a terrorist attack or two on Australian soil, a report will find that the threat from home grown terrorists has increased even further.
It’s not that hard to see the big picture. You don’t need a crystal ball to predict this one.
It’s not like we are pioneers in the “let’s try to integrate an ideology that is incompatible with Western culture into our peaceful country” all in the name of multiculturalism.
All we have to do is look at all those western countries that went before us. The UK is a perfect example.

I’m astounded that we are asking a Muslim to advise us on this when we should be asking someone like Allen West.

Australia”s decision to avoid taking the intelligent path in favour of Stupid st has cost us dearly. But it’s OK because as we continue travelling merrily along the road without a thought to the future, at least we can take comfort in the knowledge that no one can call us the “R” word.

I have one word to describe the person responsible for this:

LEGEND!!!